Aiemann Zahabi vs Javid Basharat

Aiemann Zahabi's 2-fight experience advantage (7 vs 5 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Aiemann Zahabi for the expected result. Had Javid Basharat pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Aiemann Zahabi earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Aiemann Zahabi edged the striking exchanges with 75 vs 67 significant strikes, 43.1% vs 32.7% accuracy. Aiemann Zahabi capitalized on this striking dominance.

Minimal ground action with brief exchanges. The low volume resulted in modest ground adjustments.

Aiemann Zahabi demonstrated standard activity with 267 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Aiemann Zahabi capitalized on this activity level, while Javid Basharat's 134-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Aiemann Zahabi extended his 4-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Javid Basharat is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.