Aleksa Camur vs Nicolae Negumereanu

Both fighters entered with identical experience levels (3 fights each). On this fight, close to zero experience-based adjustments were applied.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Nicolae Negumereanu receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Aleksa Camur controlled the striking through superior volume (118 vs 99 total strikes), significant strike advantage (102 vs 71), superior accuracy (68.9% vs 36.8%). However, since Aleksa Camur lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Nicolae Negumereanu's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Nicolae Negumereanu edged out Aleksa Camur on the ground with 1 vs 0 takedowns, 4:52 of control time, earning solid ground ELO bonuses.

Nicolae Negumereanu demonstrated extended layoff with 826 days since his last fight, earning reduced bonuses due to inactivity rust. As the winner, Nicolae Negumereanu capitalized on this activity level, while Aleksa Camur's 266-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Nicolae Negumereanu started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Aleksa Camur is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.