Alessio Di Chirico vs Zak Cummings

Zak Cummings's 5-fight experience advantage (13 vs 8 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Zak Cummings for the expected result. Had Alessio Di Chirico pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Zak Cummings earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Zak Cummings controlled the striking exchanges, including 1 devastating knockdown. Zak Cummings capitalized on this striking dominance.

The fight remained exclusively on the feet with zero ground action, resulting in neutral ground scoring for both fighters.

Zak Cummings demonstrated standard activity with 357 days since his last fight, earning no activity bonus. As the winner, Zak Cummings capitalized on this activity level, while Alessio Di Chirico's 336-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Zak Cummings started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Alessio Di Chirico is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.