Amanda Lemos vs Gillian Robertson

Gillian Robertson's 5-fight experience advantage (20 vs 15 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Gillian Robertson for the expected result. Had Amanda Lemos pulled off the upset, her experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Gillian Robertson earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Amanda Lemos controlled the striking through significant strike advantage (42 vs 12), superior accuracy (57.5% vs 46.2%). However, since Amanda Lemos lost the overall fight, her striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Gillian Robertson's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Gillian Robertson controlled Amanda Lemos on the ground with 3 vs 1 takedowns, 9:17 of control time, 1 ground strike, earning substantial ground ELO bonuses.

Gillian Robertson demonstrated standard activity with 315 days since her last fight, earning no activity bonus. As the winner, Gillian Robertson capitalized on this activity level, while Amanda Lemos's 182-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Gillian Robertson continued building serious momentum with a 5-fight win streak, earning a strong bonus as streak bonuses escalate. Amanda Lemos's now at 0.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.