Batgerel Danaa vs Kyung Ho Kang

Kyung Ho Kang's 5-fight experience advantage (11 vs 6 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Kyung Ho Kang for the expected result. Had Batgerel Danaa pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Kyung Ho Kang earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Batgerel Danaa controlled the striking through solid significant strike edge (109 vs 100), superior accuracy (38.4% vs 64.5%). However, since Batgerel Danaa lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Kyung Ho Kang's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Minimal ground action with brief exchanges. The low volume resulted in modest ground adjustments.

Kyung Ho Kang demonstrated standard activity with 203 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Kyung Ho Kang capitalized on this activity level, while Batgerel Danaa's 77-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Kyung Ho Kang started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Batgerel Danaa is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.