Chas Skelly vs Jim Alers

Chas Skelly's 2-fight experience advantage (4 vs 2 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Chas Skelly for the expected result. Had Jim Alers pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Chas Skelly gained a finish with a KO/TKO in round 2, earning finishing bonuses.

Chas Skelly controlled the striking exchanges with 42 vs 33 significant strikes, 61.8% vs 52.4% accuracy, including 1 devastating knockdown. Chas Skelly capitalized on this striking dominance.

Chas Skelly landed 1 knockdown followed by 2 ground strikes. Few ground strikes after a knockdown do not qualify for major ground ELO bonus.

Chas Skelly demonstrated solid activity levels with 163 days since his last fight, earning a moderate activity bonus for consistent scheduling. As the winner, Chas Skelly capitalized on this activity level, while Jim Alers's 310-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Chas Skelly extended his 3-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Jim Alers is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.