Dan Hooker vs Nasrat Haqparast

Dan Hooker's 9-fight experience advantage (17 vs 8 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Dan Hooker for the expected result. Had Nasrat Haqparast pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Dan Hooker earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Dan Hooker dominated the striking exchanges with 177 vs 35 total strikes, 73 vs 27 significant strikes, 47.7% vs 39.1% accuracy. Dan Hooker capitalized on this striking dominance.

Dan Hooker dominated Nasrat Haqparast on the ground with 3 vs 0 takedowns, 7:04 of control time, 4 ground strikes, earning massive ground ELO bonuses.

Dan Hooker demonstrated standard activity with 245 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Dan Hooker capitalized on this activity level, while Nasrat Haqparast's 196-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Dan Hooker started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Nasrat Haqparast is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.