Dan Ige vs Nate Landwehr

Dan Ige's 7-fight experience advantage (14 vs 7 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Dan Ige for the expected result. Had Nate Landwehr pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Dan Ige earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Dan Ige controlled the striking exchanges with 88 vs 74 significant strikes, 47.8% vs 37.9% accuracy, including 1 devastating knockdown. Dan Ige capitalized on this striking dominance.

Dan Ige landed 1 knockdown followed by 4 ground strikes. Few ground strikes after a knockdown do not qualify for major ground ELO bonus.

Dan Ige demonstrated solid activity levels with 147 days since his last fight, earning a moderate activity bonus for consistent scheduling. As the winner, Dan Ige capitalized on this activity level, while Nate Landwehr's 77-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Dan Ige extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Nate Landwehr is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.