David Zawada vs Ramazan Emeev

Ramazan Emeev's 2-fight experience advantage (6 vs 4 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Ramazan Emeev for the expected result. Had David Zawada pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Ramazan Emeev receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Ramazan Emeev edged the striking exchanges with 53 vs 44 significant strikes, 52.5% vs 38.6% accuracy. Ramazan Emeev capitalized on this striking dominance.

Ramazan Emeev controlled David Zawada on the ground with 4 vs 1 takedowns, 4:28 of control time, 5 ground strikes, earning substantial ground ELO bonuses.

Ramazan Emeev demonstrated solid activity levels with 176 days since his last fight, earning a moderate activity bonus for consistent scheduling. As the winner, Ramazan Emeev capitalized on this activity level, while David Zawada's 434-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Ramazan Emeev extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. David Zawada is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.