Francimar Barroso vs Gian Villante

Gian Villante's 3-fight experience advantage (12 vs 9 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Gian Villante for the expected result. Had Francimar Barroso pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Gian Villante receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Francimar Barroso controlled the striking through superior accuracy (57.8% vs 35.4%). However, since Francimar Barroso lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Gian Villante's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

The fight remained exclusively on the feet with zero ground action, resulting in neutral ground scoring for both fighters.

Gian Villante demonstrated standard activity with 183 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Gian Villante capitalized on this activity level, while Francimar Barroso's 141-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Gian Villante started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Francimar Barroso is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.