Gleison Tibau vs Piotr Hallmann

Gleison Tibau's 19-fight experience advantage (23 vs 4 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Gleison Tibau for the expected result. Had Piotr Hallmann pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Gleison Tibau receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Piotr Hallmann controlled the striking through overwhelming volume (86 vs 41 total strikes), significant strike advantage (52 vs 30). However, since Piotr Hallmann lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Gleison Tibau's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Gleison Tibau controlled Piotr Hallmann on the ground with 5 vs 0 takedowns, 5:39 of control time, earning substantial ground ELO bonuses.

Gleison Tibau demonstrated excellent fighting frequency with 59 days since his last fight, earning a solid activity bonus for maintaining rhythm. As the winner, Gleison Tibau capitalized on this activity level, while Piotr Hallmann's 98-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Gleison Tibau extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Piotr Hallmann is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.