Guram Kutateladze vs Mateusz Gamrot

Both fighters entered with identical experience levels (1 fights each). On this fight, close to zero experience-based adjustments were applied.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Guram Kutateladze receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Mateusz Gamrot controlled the striking through superior volume (69 vs 43 total strikes), significant strike advantage (52 vs 37). However, since Mateusz Gamrot lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Guram Kutateladze's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Guram Kutateladze landed 1 knockdown followed by 2 ground strikes. Few ground strikes after a knockdown do not qualify for major ground ELO bonus.

Guram Kutateladze demonstrated incredible warrior mentality with a tournament-style turnaround with within null days since his last fight, earning one of the highest possible activity bonuses for the lightning-quick return. As the winner, Guram Kutateladze capitalized on this activity level, while Mateusz Gamrot's null-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Guram Kutateladze started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Mateusz Gamrot is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.