Hyder Amil vs Jamall Emmers

Jamall Emmers's 4-fight experience advantage (9 vs 5 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Jamall Emmers for the expected result. Had Hyder Amil pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Jamall Emmers earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Jamall Emmers slightly outperformed the striking exchanges with 49.5% vs 37.6% accuracy. Jamall Emmers capitalized on this striking dominance.

Jamall Emmers dominated Hyder Amil on the ground with 7 vs 0 takedowns, 8:35 of control time, 9 ground strikes, earning massive ground ELO bonuses.

Jamall Emmers demonstrated standard activity with 224 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Jamall Emmers capitalized on this activity level, while Hyder Amil's 133-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Jamall Emmers extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Hyder Amil is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.