Jared Hamman vs Kyle Kingsbury

September 14, 2010

Light Heavyweight Bout

Click any category to learn how it's calculated.

975
(-31)
Jared Hamman
Winner: Kyle Kingsbury
Decision - Unanimous
Round 3 • 5:00

No Predictions Available

Predictions and betting recommendations are only available for fights after July 10, 2025

C-ELO Evolution

Jared Hamman-31
Kyle Kingsbury+34
1028
(+34)
Kyle Kingsbury

C-ELO™ Evolution Comparison

Fight Stats & ELO Performance

Experience ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -21Kyle Kingsbury: +31

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Total UFC Fights33
Experience Gap00
Experience ELO9891 042
ELO Change-21+31
💡

What Happened

Both fighters entered with identical experience levels (3 fights each). On this fight, close to zero experience-based adjustments were applied.

Title Fight ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -21Kyle Kingsbury: +21

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Title Fight ?NoNo
Title Fight ELO9791 021
ELO Change-21+21
💡

What Happened

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Win Type ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -46Kyle Kingsbury: +46

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Fight OutcomeDecision - UnanimousDecision - Unanimous
Last Round33
Time of Finish5:005:00
Win Type ELO9541 015
ELO Change-46+46
💡

What Happened

Kyle Kingsbury earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Striking ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -21Kyle Kingsbury: +21

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Significant Strikes Landed8879
Significant Strikes Attempted239219
Total Strikes Landed14688
Knockdowns Scored00
Striking ELO9821 023
ELO Change-21+21
💡

What Happened

Jared Hamman controlled the striking through overwhelming volume (146 vs 88 total strikes), solid significant strike edge (88 vs 79). However, since Jared Hamman lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Kyle Kingsbury's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Ground ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -82Kyle Kingsbury: +82

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Takedowns Landed09
Takedowns Attempted213
Ground Control Time0:154:44
Ground Strikes Landed32
Ground ELO9331 049
ELO Change-82+82
💡

What Happened

Kyle Kingsbury controlled Jared Hamman on the ground with 9 vs 0 takedowns, 4:44 of control time, 2 ground strikes, earning substantial ground ELO bonuses.

Activity ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -22Kyle Kingsbury: +22

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Days Since Last Fight172326
Activity ELO9991 022
ELO Change-22+22
💡

What Happened

Kyle Kingsbury demonstrated standard activity with 326 days since his last fight, earning no activity bonus. As the winner, Kyle Kingsbury capitalized on this activity level, while Jared Hamman's 172-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Win Streak ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -21Kyle Kingsbury: +25

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Win Streak02
Win Streak ELO9811 027
ELO Change-21+25
💡

What Happened

Kyle Kingsbury extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Jared Hamman is back at 0 with this loss.

Basic/Category ELO
ELO Changes
Jared Hamman: -21Kyle Kingsbury: +21

Performance Statistics

MetricJared HammanKyle Kingsbury
Weight ClassLight HeavyweightLight Heavyweight
Double Championship FightNoNo
Basic/Category ELO9791 021
ELO Change-21+21
💡

What Happened

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.