Jeremiah Wells vs Max Griffin

Max Griffin's 10-fight experience advantage (16 vs 6 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Max Griffin for the expected result. Had Jeremiah Wells pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Max Griffin receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Jeremiah Wells controlled the striking through solid significant strike edge (32 vs 26), superior accuracy (37.2% vs 49.1%). However, since Jeremiah Wells lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Max Griffin's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Max Griffin did not secure a significant ground advantage against Jeremiah Wells on the ground with 1 takedown, 1:40 of control time, with almost no grappling bonus.

Max Griffin demonstrated standard activity with 225 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Max Griffin capitalized on this activity level, while Jeremiah Wells's 190-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Max Griffin started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Jeremiah Wells is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.