Jimy Hettes vs Robert Whiteford

Jimy Hettes's 3-fight experience advantage (4 vs 1 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Jimy Hettes for the expected result. Had Robert Whiteford pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Jimy Hettes earned a finish with a Submission in round 2 at 2:17, earning finishing bonuses for the submission. Robert Whiteford was submitted.

Robert Whiteford controlled the striking through significant strike advantage (15 vs 5), superior accuracy (53.6% vs 100.0%). However, since Robert Whiteford lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Jimy Hettes's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Jimy Hettes dominated Robert Whiteford on the ground with 3 vs 0 takedowns, 4:20 of control time, earning massive ground ELO bonuses. The submission finish significantly amplified the grappling rewards.

Jimy Hettes demonstrated extended layoff with 399 days since his last fight, earning reduced bonuses due to inactivity rust. As the winner, Jimy Hettes capitalized on this activity level, while Robert Whiteford's null-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Jimy Hettes started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Robert Whiteford is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.