Jon Jones vs Matt Hamill

December 4, 2009

Light Heavyweight Bout

Click any category to learn how it's calculated.

1103
(-19)
Jon Jones
Winner: Matt Hamill
DQ
Round 1 • 4:14

No Predictions Available

Predictions and betting recommendations are only available for fights after July 10, 2025

C-ELO Evolution

Jon Jones-19
Matt Hamill+20
1182
(+20)
Matt Hamill

C-ELO™ Evolution Comparison

Fight Stats & ELO Performance

Experience ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -31Matt Hamill: +31

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Total UFC Fights49
Experience Gap-55
Experience ELO1 0801 149
ELO Change-31+31
💡

What Happened

Matt Hamill's 5-fight experience advantage (9 vs 4 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Matt Hamill for the expected result. Had Jon Jones pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

Title Fight ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -20Matt Hamill: +20

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Title Fight ?NoNo
Title Fight ELO1 0451 101
ELO Change-20+20
💡

What Happened

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Win Type ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -7Matt Hamill: +7

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Fight OutcomeDQDQ
Last Round11
Time of Finish4:144:14
Win Type ELO1 1601 294
ELO Change-7+7
💡

What Happened

The fight concluded with Matt Hamill earning a DQ, with adjustments based on the nature of the result.

Striking ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -16Matt Hamill: +16

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Significant Strikes Landed445
Significant Strikes Attempted8817
Total Strikes Landed557
Knockdowns Scored00
Striking ELO1 1241 243
ELO Change-16+16
💡

What Happened

Jon Jones controlled the striking through overwhelming volume (55 vs 7 total strikes), significant strike advantage (44 vs 5), superior accuracy (50.0% vs 29.4%). However, since Jon Jones lost the overall fight, his striking superiority couldn't be converted into ELO bonuses. Matt Hamill's positive striking ELO reflects the overall victory rather than striking dominance.

Ground ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -21Matt Hamill: +21

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Takedowns Landed10
Takedowns Attempted11
Ground Control Time1:240:00
Ground Strikes Landed330
Ground ELO1 2151 259
ELO Change-21+21
💡

What Happened

Matt Hamill did not secure a significant ground advantage against Jon Jones on the ground with 0 takedowns, with almost no grappling bonus.

Activity ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -17Matt Hamill: +17

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Days Since Last Fight148273
Activity ELO1 0931 188
ELO Change-17+17
💡

What Happened

Matt Hamill demonstrated standard activity with 273 days since his last fight, earning no activity bonus. As the winner, Matt Hamill capitalized on this activity level, while Jon Jones's 148-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Win Streak ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -20Matt Hamill: +26

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Win Streak03
Win Streak ELO1 0581 122
ELO Change-20+26
💡

What Happened

Matt Hamill extended his 3-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Jon Jones is back at 0 with this loss.

Basic/Category ELO
ELO Changes
Jon Jones: -20Matt Hamill: +20

Performance Statistics

MetricJon JonesMatt Hamill
Weight ClassLight HeavyweightLight Heavyweight
Double Championship FightNoNo
Basic/Category ELO1 0451 097
ELO Change-20+20
💡

What Happened

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.