Leo Kuntz vs Tae Hyun Bang

Tae Hyun Bang's 2-fight experience advantage (4 vs 2 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Tae Hyun Bang for the expected result. Had Leo Kuntz pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

The controversial Decision - Split reflected a closely contested battle, with Tae Hyun Bang receiving reduced bonuses due to the lack of clear domination.

Tae Hyun Bang controlled the striking exchanges with 54 vs 31 significant strikes, 49.5% vs 34.1% accuracy, including 1 devastating knockdown. Tae Hyun Bang capitalized on this striking dominance.

Tae Hyun Bang landed 1 knockdown followed by 9 ground strikes. Few ground strikes after a knockdown do not qualify for major ground ELO bonus.

Tae Hyun Bang demonstrated standard activity with 197 days since his last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Tae Hyun Bang capitalized on this activity level, while Leo Kuntz's 190-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Tae Hyun Bang started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Leo Kuntz is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.