Nate Quarry vs Tim Credeur

Nate Quarry's 5-fight experience advantage (9 vs 4 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Nate Quarry for the expected result. Had Tim Credeur pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Nate Quarry earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Nate Quarry dominated the striking exchanges with 124 vs 56 total strikes, 53 vs 40 significant strikes, 40.5% vs 24.7% accuracy, including 2 devastating knockdowns. Nate Quarry capitalized on this striking dominance.

Nate Quarry controlled Tim Credeur on the ground with 8:01 of control time, 15 ground strikes, earning substantial ground ELO bonuses.

Nate Quarry demonstrated solid activity levels with 151 days since his last fight, earning a moderate activity bonus for consistent scheduling. As the winner, Nate Quarry capitalized on this activity level, while Tim Credeur's 168-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Nate Quarry extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Tim Credeur is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.