Nathan Coy vs Zak Cummings

Zak Cummings's 5-fight experience advantage (8 vs 3 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Zak Cummings for the expected result. Had Nathan Coy pulled off the upset, his experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Zak Cummings earned an early finish with a Submission in round 1 at 4:21, gaining additional bonuses for the first-round submission.

Zak Cummings slightly outperformed the striking exchanges with 34.7% vs 56.1% accuracy. Zak Cummings capitalized on this striking dominance.

Minimal ground action with brief exchanges. The low volume resulted in modest ground adjustments.

Zak Cummings demonstrated solid activity levels with 147 days since his last fight, earning a moderate activity bonus for consistent scheduling. As the winner, Zak Cummings capitalized on this activity level, while Nathan Coy's 419-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Zak Cummings extended his 2-fight win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Nathan Coy is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.