Tabatha Ricci vs Yan Xiaonan

Yan Xiaonan's 3-fight experience advantage (12 vs 9 fights) held true, but the algorithm limited the bonus to prevent over-rewarding Yan Xiaonan for the expected result. Had Tabatha Ricci pulled off the upset, her experience disadvantage would have delivered a modest upset bonus.

This was not a title fight, so both fighters received standard ELO adjustments. However, since ELO is a relative system, victories over former champions can have an indirect impact, and Title Fight ELO can differ from Basic ELO.

Yan Xiaonan earned a clear Decision - Unanimous, receiving full decision bonuses for controlling the fight across all rounds. Of course, a finish would have yielded even greater rewards.

Yan Xiaonan dominated the striking exchanges with 89 vs 17 total strikes, 78 vs 15 significant strikes, 48.4% vs 14.6% accuracy. Yan Xiaonan capitalized on this striking dominance.

Minimal ground action with brief exchanges. The low volume resulted in modest ground adjustments.

Yan Xiaonan demonstrated standard activity with 225 days since her last fight, earning a small activity bonus for reasonable scheduling. As the winner, Yan Xiaonan capitalized on this activity level, while Tabatha Ricci's 92-day layoff didn't factor into the scoring since only winners receive activity bonuses.

Yan Xiaonan started a new win streak, earning a momentum bonus. Tabatha Ricci is back at 0 with this loss.

This category provides the foundation ELO scoring without bonuses, except for exceptional multiple division champions.